Safe Schools Agains Violence in Educutation Act
An overview of the new school violence prevention law |
|
Sheldon Silver Speaker of the Assembly |
Steven Sanders |
February 2001 |
Executive Summary | |
The Assembly Majority is committed to assuring New York�s children the highest quality education possible. However, our efforts will prove futile unless we guarantee our children safe schools. Towards this end, the Assembly took the lead by crafting and passing school violence legislation for the past five years. This year, as a direct outgrowth of these efforts, comprehensive school violence legislation was enacted. This new law, signed Chapter 181 of the laws of 2000, is entitled Project SAVE or the Safe Schools Against Violence in Education Act. To protect students and staff and ensure a safe climate for learning, this law contains new initiatives with regard to student suspensions, codes of conduct, and school safety plans. While the law went into effect on November 1, 2000, school districts are not required to comply with most of the requirements until July 1, 2001. Below is a brief summary of this new law:
| |
|
| |
Removal of Violent or Disruptive Students | |
| |
| |
| |
Code of Conduct | |
| |
| |
| |
School Safety Plan | |
| |
| |
| |
Uniform Violent Incident Reporting System | |
| |
| |
| |
School Violence Prevention Grant Program | |
| |
| |
| |
Increases Communication Between the Juvenile Justice System and the Schools | |
| |
| |
| |
Increases Penalties for Assaults Committed on School Grounds | |
| |
| |
| |
Teacher Training, New Disciplinary Measures, and Whistleblower Protection for School Employees | |
| |
| |
| |
Character Education and Other Curriculum Changes | |
| |
|
| |
Violent Students Violent students must be removed from the school setting and | |
| |
1. Ensuring Removal of Violent Students from the Classroom | |
Altering the Current Administrative Process Previously, Section 3214 was vague as to what behavior constituted a suspendable offense. For example, a student may have been suspended for being "insubordinate or disorderly" or if their mental condition "endangered the health, safety, or morals of himself or of other pupils."
| |
| |
2. Uniform Incident Reporting System | |
|
|
Disruptive Students The majority of discipline problems in school districts are caused by repeatedly substantially disruptive students. Project SAVE addresses those students as follows: |
|
1. Amending the Code of Conduct A. Increasing Community Involvement The provisions for developing a Code of Conduct appear in the Commissioner�s Regulations, section 100.2. Prior to passage of Project SAVE, the Regulations required that the Code be developed " in consultation" with teachers, administrators and parents. The Regulations also required that the local board of education review the policy annually. The legislation establishes more meaningful participation by members of the community including teachers, parents and other school personnel in the development of the Code of Conduct by:
While the elements of the Code of Conduct should primarily be determined at the local level, there are some elements which are required to address the chronically disruptive or potentially dangerous student who has not committed a violent act. These include:
This law grants the Commissioner enforcement power, such as the ability to withhold state aid temporarily, if a school district has failed to comply with the provisions regarding the Code of Conduct. It also requires the Commissioner to issue definitional guidelines for certain terms, such as "repeatedly are substantially disruptive." Also gives the Chancellor comparable enforcement powers with respect to the schools in New York City. |
|
2. Removal of Disruptive Students
|
3. Security � School Safety Plan Currently, the local board of education has the duty to keep schools safe and has jurisdiction over any employees who are hired by the district to ensure the safety of their schools. As with the Code of Conduct, safety and community participation are increased by requiring:
Elements of the district wide plan must include:
To provide additional financial support to address the safety concerns of school districts statewide, the new law:
In order to determine where there may be the most need and assess the impact of various violence prevention programs, Project SAVE requires the creation of a uniform violent incident reporting system. Key components include:
|
|
|
Juvenile Justice The goal of this aspect of the law is the enactment of measures designed to: (a) make schools safer places for teachers and staff to work and students to learn; and (b) increase the effectiveness of the juvenile justice system and improve communication between the juvenile justice system and the educational system. |
|
1. Makes Schools a Safer Place for Students and Staff A. Increasing Penalties for Assaults by Students Against School Employees and Assaults by School Employees Against Students Assault is currently a class "A" misdemeanor, with an authorized sentence of up to one year in jail (12 months OCFS for youths, subject to extension). Assault with a deadly weapon or dangerous instrument, or which causes serious physical injury, is a class D felony (up to seven years for first offenders; 18 months OCFS for youths, subject to extension). To send a strong message denouncing violence against teachers and other school district personnel, we raised simple assault against a school employee from an A misdemeanor to a D felony (second degree assault). Additionally, to reflect the goal of schools as safe havens and to assure symmetry, we raised school employee-on-student assaults to class D felony status. B. Use of Certain Evidence in Suspension Proceedings A recent decision by the New York Court of Appeals, Juan C. v. Cortines, held that school officials could suspend a student caught carrying a gun in school if school officials believed the gun seizure was proper, even though an earlier court ruling had excluded the gun as evidence in a juvenile delinquency case. The law codifies this sensible ruling and expands it to ensure that it is applicable in every case in which a student is caught carrying a gun in school. |
|
2. Increases the Effectiveness of the Juvenile Justice System and Increases Communication with the School District Previously, there was no consistent or formal means by which a school district or educator was notified of a student's return to school after detention. This legislation solves this problem by requiring the designated educational official to act as the liaison between the two systems and authorizing them to receive notification from the Family Court System and to coordinate the student's participation in programs which may exist in the school district or community including: non-violent conflict resolution programs, peer mediation programs or other school violence prevention and intervention programs. The courts will be required to provide notification of conviction to the designated educational official of an enrolled student's conviction and sentence for the purpose of executing the student's educational plan, successful school adjustment and re-entry into the community. Futhermore, any students who are released or conditionally released from a facility must be given a plan which includes steps to ensure that the student is promptly enrolled in an educational program. |
|
|
Resources |
In addition to the School Violence Prevention Grant Program established in the Project Save legislation which was funded in the 2000-01 budget at $30.2 million under Extended School Day/School Violence Prevention, numerous other state and federal programs may be available as resources in developing a violence prevention program in your school district. Some of the programs include: the Advantage Schools Program that seeks to facilitate the intellectual and social development of youth by providing supplemental learning experiences after traditional school hours delivered in the school building; the Youth-at-Risk Fund supports school districts and BOCES programs promoting partnerships between schools, community groups, private business, social service providers and local governments to serve at-risk youth; the Youth Enterprise Program promotes the coordination of school and community resources to provide a full array of services for youth at risk of not completing school for a variety of reasons including drug and alcohol abuse, pregnancy, parenthood, academic failure or family problems; and the Transferring Success Program encourages local school districts to address their educational problems or priorities by adopting state or nationally validated programs. The Transferring Success Program includes at-risk youth, parent partnerships, and assisting school districts to address their school improvement needs. School districts and BOCES with high percentages of disadvantaged students also may apply for the Schools as Community Sites grant to promote coordinated management of the resources of the schools and communities. The Safe and Drug-Free Schools and Communities Act provides federal funds to local agencies to establish substance abuse and violence prevention programs. Funds for this program are available on a non-competitive basis and the amount of money is based on the number of students attending school, public or private. The Innovative Education Program Strategies grant is another federal program which supports local educational reform efforts consistent with the National Education Goals and statewide reform efforts under Goals 2000, and to provide a source of innovation and educational improvement. For additional resources, a helpful guide to both state and federal programs is the "Catalog of State and Federal Programs Aiding New York�s Local Governments" by the Legislative Commission on State-Local Relations (518- 455-5035) which is published every two years. The 2001 edition will be released in March. |
| |
Directory of Contacts for Project SAVE If you have questions regarding the implementation of the following sections of Project SAVE, you should first consult with your school district�s attorney but if there are remaining questions, you can contact the person(s) listed under that particular section(s): |
1. Suspensions of Violent and Disruptive Pupils Contact: John Soja Supervisor Health and Pupil Services NYS Education Department (518) 486-6090 2. Teacher Removal 3. Code of Conduct 4. Uniform Violent Incident Reporting System 5. Whistleblower Protection for School Employees 6. Omnibus School Violence Prevention Grant Program 7. School Violence Prevention and Intervention Training for School Employees 8. Court Reporting of Sentences to Schools and the Designated Education Official 9. Building-level School Emergency Response Plan 10. Instruction in Civility, Citizenship, and Character Education | 11. School Safety Plans Contact: John Soja Supervisor Health and Pupil Services NYS Education Department (518) 486-6090 OR Contact: The New York State Center for School Safety Ulster BOCES 175 Route 32 North New Paltz, NY 12561 Phone: (845) 255-8989 Fax: (845) 255-3836 Email: scss@int1.mhrcc.org Website: www.mhrcc.org/scss 12. Interpersonal Violence Prevention Education Package 13. Commissioner�s Powers Regarding the Annulment or Suspension of Teaching Licenses Other Useful Contacts: 14. NYS Education Department 15. The New York State Center for School Safety 16. Useful Web Sites |
Source: https://nyassembly.gov/Reports/PandC/ProjSave/
0 Response to "Safe Schools Agains Violence in Educutation Act"
إرسال تعليق